We have specifically rejected this interpretation.
Under appellees' theory, the Attorney General of the United States could be considered the custodian of every prisoner in federal custody because he supervises the Federal Bureau of Prisons. But their argument extends to any person or entity possessing some sort of power to release them. Appellees argue that because the Commission has the power to release them, the Commission is their custodian. But this power does not make the Commission the prisoners' custodian in the sense of the habeas corpus statute. Were the Commission to decide to change the prisoners' parole eligibility dates today, they might be freed. It is clear that the Parole Commission is responsible for the appellees' continued detention. While we agree that the habeas determination is not inflexible, we reject appellees' argument that, in this case, the Parole Commission can be properly characterized as their custodian. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky, 410 U.S. The District Court reasoned that "even if were required to bring their action under the habeas corpus statutes, it is not an inflexible determination that they must bring their action in the district of confinement.
In this case, the District Court construed the prisoners' complaint as either an application for a writ of habeas corpus or an application for a writ of mandamus. This classification obviated any possibility of parole.Ī district court may not entertain a habeas corpus action unless it has personal jurisdiction over the custodian of the prisoner. The Parole Commission thus classified the appellees' crimes as severity level six, among the most serious offenses. In this case, the Commission also determined that the crime that appellants were accessories to was the most serious crime investigated by the grand jury-murder.
#Edwin meese attorney general prison manual#
Notes and Procedures to 618(a), United States Parole Commission, Rules and Procedures Manual (1984) (providing for analogy to accessory after the fact). The guidelines do not explicitly treat the crime of criminal contempt, but the Commission has likened it to the crime of accessory after the fact. The guidelines also provide for a "salient factor score," which predicts the potential risk of parole violation by each prisoner. The guidelines rate the severity of crimes from severity level one, for minor crimes, to severity level eight for very serious crimes. He published his memoir in 1992, entitled With Reagan: The Inside Story.The Parole Commission generally follows a set of guidelines in determining prisoners' presumptive parole eligibility dates.
Appointed by President Reagan, he became the 75th Attorney General on February 25th, 1985.
During this time he was a member of the National Security Council and chaired the Domestic Policy Council and the National Drug Policy Board. Meese held the position of counselor to President Reagan. He accepted a position with the law school of the University of San Diego in 1977, became a professor of law and Director of the school’s Center for Criminal Justice Policy and Management. Meese worked for Rohr Industries in California and had a solo law practice. Beginning in 1967 he worked in various capacities for California Governor Reagan as secretary on clemency and crime issues, as an executive assistant, as chief of staff and as a senior advisor on policy issues. During this time he also helped teach a clinical law program. Meese joined the Oakland District Attorney’s office serving as a deputy district attorney for Alameda County, California until 1967. He took a two-year leave during law school to serve as an artillery officer in the Army and eventually retired as a colonel in the United States Army Reserve. He received his bachelor’s degree from Yale University in 1953 and earned his law degree from the University of California at Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law in 1958. Edwin Meese, III was born on Decemin Oakland, California.
0 kommentar(er)
